Comparing strategies - Yield Grab, “Tighten the Noose” etc

Written on April 30, 2008 by OptionsRopeaDope

On the CBOE website a very interesting webcast popped up, “Options Strategy Series Part II: Butterfly Spreads featuring Steve Papale” by Steve Papale. (You can find it at the OIC website, click “Guest/Faculty Archives.” It covers butterflies, including something I never thought about - because of the volatility skew, butterflies on indexes and equities actually always have a slightly negative delta. Interesting.

The most interesting thing though is the comparison of three different strategies for profit taking. In each case, the butterflies were opened on the second friday of the month (one month ahead), then closed the next second friday while another was opened like clockwork. The period covered from January 2002 through the end of 2007, so it included a massive selloff through 2002, then the steady bull through 2007. In each case an extra OTM call was purchased to even the deltas, not sure how that factored into the results though. The OTM long was “just inside” the 1st Std Dev. Here were the three approaches:

  • Let the trades run as described above - keep open until the second friday of the month no matter what.
  • Close the trade when: a 10% profit is realized, or when the underlying touches one of the long strikes in the butterfly.
  • Close the trade when: same as above, except keep a trailing stop of 5% on the profit amount (when 10% is reached, close if drops to 5%, if 15%, close if it retreats to 10%, etc.) The idea is to let profits run.

The results are in the screenshot below. The “Seasonal” is the first option, and very erratic. The smoothest option is actually the “Yield Grab”, or close at 10%, which had a yearly ROR of about 25%. If nothing else, goes to show a risk management plan and how it can influence returns. As Dan Sheridan says “never say, ‘let’s put this on and see what happens!’”

Butterstrats.jpg

 

Popularity: 17% [?]

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Other posts like this one:

  • When to use a double calendar, triple calendar, or single calendar?
  • OptionsXpress major goof
  • Book Review - The Options Workbook by Anthony Saliba
  • Margin for Double Diagonals
  • Greek exposure - calculations
  • RSS feed | Trackback URI

    Comments »

    No comments yet.

    Name (required)
    E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
    URI
    Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
    You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

    Trackback responses to this post

    Copyright (C) 2008, OptionsRopeADope, LLC All rights reserved. U.S. Government Required Disclaimer: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.*Futures, options, and spot currency trading have large potential rewards, but also large potential risk. You must be aware of the risks and be willing to accept them in order to invest in the futures and options markets. Don't trade with money you can't afford to lose. This website is neither a solicitation nor an offer to Buy/Sell futures or options. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those discussed on this website. The past performance of any trading system or methodology is not necessarily indicative of future results. CFTC RULE 4.41 - HYPOTHETICAL OR SIMULATED PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE CERTAIN LIMITATIONS. UNLIKE AN ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RECORD, SIMULATED RESULTS DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL TRADING. ALSO, SINCE THE TRADES HAVE NOT BEEN EXECUTED, THE RESULTS MAY HAVE UNDER-OR-OVER COMPENSATED FOR THE IMPACT, IF ANY, OF CERTAIN MARKET FACTORS, SUCH AS LACK OF LIQUIDITY. SIMULATED TRADING PROGRAMS IN GENERAL ARE ALSO SUBJECT TO THE FACT THAT THEY ARE DESIGNED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFIT OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN.