Adjust - EEM 150/160 Double Calendar

Written on June 5, 2008 by OptionsRopeaDope

Lesson learned on this one - I waited too late to adjust, as EEM gapped down yesterday. EEM was on the edge of my adjustment point on and off for a couple of weeks (my adjustment point should have been about 148). It had dropped to about 146 by the time I pulled the trigger. Big faux pas. I’m going to put this in the “never make that mistake again” file. Adjustments are not to protect profit, but to prevent loss, and I lost sight of that, as I didn’t want to see my profit potential drop significantly.

My original position was -

EEM 150 Jun/Sep Calls

On 5/19, I closed half the position and added a 160 calendar. Iteration 2:

EEM 150 Jun/Sep Calls, EEM 160 Jun/Sep Calls

Yesterday I had a number of choices to make… First, EEM was already near 145 and had a couple of big down days. In addition, I’m not technician, but I could have sworn I saw the famous “head and shoulders” on the price graph, built over the last coupld of months. Looked to me like a strong down trend. So, I took all of the 160 calendar off, and moved it down to 140.

Next, desiring to reduce the capital in the trade, instead of opening a Jun/Sep time spread on 140, I chose the Jun/July. Reduced my cost quite a bit. The trade is below.

EEM 150 Jun/Sep Calls, EEM 140 Jun/July Calls

EEM140150.jpg

As luck would have it, today EEM rocketed up a smooth 2.5 standard deviations (that’s supposed to only happen once a year or so!) closing at 149.90. Nice! Or not. (Despite that, IV actually dropped today) Luckily, as can be seen in the pic, the Jun/Seps at 150 are actually helping me right now, giving an extra wide break even. It also got me very near to delta neutral, which I appreciate.

In an analysis of this trade, I’m currently down 14% on my initial capital outlay. I no longer have a chance of hitting 20% profit on the trade, but I have a very high chance of breaking even. The Jun-July skew is even greater now (over 4%) so the June options should have alot of decay in their short life. The greeks:

EEM Calendar - 150 Jun/Sep / 140 Jun/Jul 

RRDelta -9%
RRGamma -7%
RRVega 31%

Delta/Theta = -1.02

1 Day 1 Std Dev Move (2.04 points)

 

Popularity: 12% [?]

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Other posts like this one:

  • When to use a double calendar, triple calendar, or single calendar?
  • RTH Double Calendar Close, 20% Profit
  • Open - EEM, RTH, MSFT Calendars
  • Adjust - EEM 130 to Double Calendar (130/40(!!))
  • Dan Sheridan’s Double Calendar Rules
  • RSS feed | Trackback URI

    Comments »

    No comments yet.

    Name (required)
    E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
    URI
    Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
    You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

    Trackback responses to this post

    Copyright (C) 2008, OptionsRopeADope, LLC All rights reserved. U.S. Government Required Disclaimer: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.*Futures, options, and spot currency trading have large potential rewards, but also large potential risk. You must be aware of the risks and be willing to accept them in order to invest in the futures and options markets. Don't trade with money you can't afford to lose. This website is neither a solicitation nor an offer to Buy/Sell futures or options. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those discussed on this website. The past performance of any trading system or methodology is not necessarily indicative of future results. CFTC RULE 4.41 - HYPOTHETICAL OR SIMULATED PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE CERTAIN LIMITATIONS. UNLIKE AN ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RECORD, SIMULATED RESULTS DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL TRADING. ALSO, SINCE THE TRADES HAVE NOT BEEN EXECUTED, THE RESULTS MAY HAVE UNDER-OR-OVER COMPENSATED FOR THE IMPACT, IF ANY, OF CERTAIN MARKET FACTORS, SUCH AS LACK OF LIQUIDITY. SIMULATED TRADING PROGRAMS IN GENERAL ARE ALSO SUBJECT TO THE FACT THAT THEY ARE DESIGNED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFIT OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN.