<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Close - RTH Condor</title>
	<link>http://www.optionsropeadope.com/2008/08/06/close-rth-condor/</link>
	<description>Thoughts, Trades, and Instruction for Profiting from Options the Smart Way</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.optionsropeadope.com/2008/08/06/close-rth-condor/#comment-124</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 06:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.optionsropeadope.com/2008/08/06/close-rth-condor/#comment-124</guid>
					<description>I think you are mistaken about one thing - the required capital to be tied up.  You will find it is identical (or close enough) - due to put/call parity.  Your paid $3.80 to open the condor, therefore tying up $380.  You should find that you would have collected about $1.20 to sell the iron condor, therefore tying up $380 of capital (ie, $500 risk less credit received).

There is no difference!  Therefore, if you feel the OTM options are more liquid, then go the iron condor...

Peter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are mistaken about one thing - the required capital to be tied up.  You will find it is identical (or close enough) - due to put/call parity.  Your paid $3.80 to open the condor, therefore tying up $380.  You should find that you would have collected about $1.20 to sell the iron condor, therefore tying up $380 of capital (ie, $500 risk less credit received).</p>
<p>There is no difference!  Therefore, if you feel the OTM options are more liquid, then go the iron condor&#8230;</p>
<p>Peter.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
