Entries Categorized as 'IBM'
September 4, 2008
First a note that nearly all of the tecnical analysis blogs I read (hat tip to Slope of Hope) say that when the SPX breaks/broke 1261, that puts are on the menu. Today it closed at 1236. Lots of pressure for further downward moves, which is fine by me right now.
A few adjustments the last few […]
Popularity: 31% [?]
Posted in Real Trades, Iron Condors, Calendars, RUT, SPY, IBM
No Comments »
August 29, 2008
This should be a fun update I hope. Lots of analysis, and I hope the graphs go over well. All of my calendars are stalling right now, condors behaving as expected.
RUT Iron Condor - 650/660 puts, 780/790 Sep Calls
RRDelta
-22%
RRGamma
-1%
RRVega
-10%
Delta/Theta = -4.13
1 Day 1 Std Dev Move (9.62 points)
I already rolled the call side down (and regretted it yesterday.) […]
Popularity: 35% [?]
Posted in Real Trades, Iron Condors, Calendars, RUT, SPY, RTH, IBM, WMT
No Comments »
August 26, 2008
Forgive me for skipping the template on these in this post. These round out my positions, and were all opened this past Friday. Here is a short explanation and rationale for each:
RTH Calendar (95 puts) - RTH has been very kind, and has stayed in a tight range for a few months. After banking a […]
Popularity: 27% [?]
Posted in Real Trades, Calendars, RTH, IBM, WMT
No Comments »
August 14, 2008
Over this week until this morning, I closed out the remainder of my trades. The IBM double calendar is the only one closed for a profit - just over 10%.
I have to shake my head at the condors - the move last week (up 7%+ in 7 days) drove them into danger at the worst […]
Popularity: 21% [?]
Posted in Real Trades, Iron Condors, Calendars, EEM, IBM
No Comments »
August 4, 2008
Not much movement since the last post until today, and it was still a small movement overall. For my first adjustment of this cycle, I closed half of my EEM contracts as the position lost all its profit and seung to a loss. I had the thought of opening another calendar but didn’t at the end […]
Popularity: 26% [?]
Posted in Real Trades, Iron Condors, Calendars, QQQQ, EEM, RTH, IBM, NDX
No Comments »
July 30, 2008
Things are perfect for these positions on many levels… the portfolio is up a combined 6% now, with 16 days to go (hopefully I’ll be out within 8 though). A stray thought… I have “max loss” levels for individual trades, including that if the trade is up say 10%, I won’t let it turn into […]
Popularity: 28% [?]
Posted in Real Trades, Iron Condors, Calendars, QQQQ, EEM, RTH, IBM, NDX
No Comments »
July 29, 2008
First, plan on coming back here later this week - I plan to revamp my risk-greeks (specifically RRGamma, which doesn’t have a lot of value right now), plus write a little about some experiments I’ve done with Google Spreadsheets to analyze daily movements of the SPX and NDX based on thier IV each day, to see if […]
Popularity: 22% [?]
Posted in Real Trades, Iron Condors, Calendars, QQQQ, EEM, RTH, IBM
No Comments »
Copyright (C) 2008, OptionsRopeADope, LLC All rights reserved. U.S. Government Required Disclaimer: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.*Futures, options, and spot currency trading have large potential rewards, but also large potential risk. You must be aware of the risks and be willing to accept them in order to invest in the futures and options markets. Don't trade with money you can't afford to lose. This website is neither a solicitation nor an offer to Buy/Sell futures or options. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those discussed on this website. The past performance of any trading system or methodology is not necessarily indicative of future results. CFTC RULE 4.41 - HYPOTHETICAL OR SIMULATED PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE CERTAIN LIMITATIONS. UNLIKE AN ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RECORD, SIMULATED RESULTS DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL TRADING. ALSO, SINCE THE TRADES HAVE NOT BEEN EXECUTED, THE RESULTS MAY HAVE UNDER-OR-OVER COMPENSATED FOR THE IMPACT, IF ANY, OF CERTAIN MARKET FACTORS, SUCH AS LACK OF LIQUIDITY. SIMULATED TRADING PROGRAMS IN GENERAL ARE ALSO SUBJECT TO THE FACT THAT THEY ARE DESIGNED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFIT OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN.